StarNose Pet — Golden Master Review Package, Attempt #4

Status: CANDIDATE — NOT golden master. Only the client may declare golden master. Attempt #4 scored 19/21 on the builder scorecard; 2 criteria are partial (silhouette IoU 0.639; iris renders lighter than the reference). Reviewer instructions: check everything side by side. Compare the approved reference image directly against the matching Attempt #4 render view for every feature. Treat the exact-side view as the truth test.

REVIEWER DEMANDS (verbatim client directives — binding)

Demand 1 — Quantitative spec (verbatim):
"Next time you send for review to ChatGPT, ask it for more precise details about every feature, eg, what color code should be used, what measurements to follow, what proportions are wrong and the calculations necessary to correct it, ask it to create possibly exact body parts that can be copied and pasted into the 3D render, precise description of the color, glassy effect, and shadowing of the eyeballs. What I want are exact measurements, color codes, and calculations that will help you get it closer to an exact replica of the approved model."
Demand 2 — Position by position (verbatim):
"I need ChatGPT to be as detailed as possible in his reply when he does the comparison. Position by position. We need exact measurements, dimensions, coordinates, color changes, shadowing, segmentation, matte vs. gloss, exact corrections on the eyes, mouth, eyebrows, eyelashes, facial geometry, hands, and boots."

Your reply must go position by position: eyes, mouth, eyebrows, eyelashes, facial geometry, hands, and boots — each with exact measurements, dimensions, and coordinates. For every material: exact color codes, color changes required, shadowing, segmentation, and matte vs. gloss finish. Qualitative language is not acceptable — every correction must be a number, a coordinate, a code, or a copy-pasteable value.

Demand 3 — NEW this round (verbatim):
"This is still unacceptable. Send back to ChatGPT with the json file that he requested. Instruct him to provide specific instructions and code fixes."

This time you are not only asked for descriptions. For every defect you find, provide specific instructions AND code fixes as diffs or code snippets against build-model-v8-attempt4.js (exact parameter names, exact replacement values, copy-pasteable). Do not stop at "make the eyes darker" — give the exact code change: file line context, constant name, old value, new value.

Assets

This is a temporary private review page (not linked from the public site). It will be removed after the review round.

1. Side-by-side: approved model vs Attempt #4 five-view sheet

Approved Golden Master reference render
APPROVED REFERENCE — the immutable character spec. Exact replica required.
Attempt #4 five-view validation sheet (front, 3/4 front, exact side, 3/4 rear, rear)
ATTEMPT #4 FIVE-VIEW SHEET — front, 3/4 front, exact side, 3/4 rear, rear. One mesh, one rig, rotated for all views.

2. Build code (Three.js) — full inspection with code fixes required

The exact code behind the Attempt #4 images. Inspect it alongside the renders and the JSON spec: identify which parameters produce each visible defect, and give the exact corrected values as code diffs/snippets to copy-paste for an exact 3D replica.

Known partials to target first: (1) silhouette IoU 0.639 (pose-sensitive metric — wave 34front vs reference); (2) iris renders lighter than the reference despite the verbatim §4 gradient (#1C1D1F→#384A54→#9CB7C0→#5F6871) and dark pupil (#0D0E12, emissive 0) — pupil sphere r=0.042 occludes the dark inner stops, ACES lifts mid stops. Highlights render whiter than the reference cyan. Provide exact code fixes for each.

3. Deliverable expected from the reviewer